Define a single customer view
Jul 20,2008 00:00 by admin

Define a single customer view

Build a detailed understanding of the issues around the 360-degree view of the customer prior to making commitments to build such a view.

This recommendation does not assert that an organization should already have built such a customer view; indeed our findings confirmed that very few organizations have such a view in place at this time. This chapter asserts that organizations should build an understanding of what such a view entails, enables and costs. There are significant differences in the cost and implications of the options, and it is vital that organizations are clear on their requirement before beginning CRM programmes to put a single view of the customer in place. In the US sample, we found that most organizations recognized the significance of the issue but tended to be inconclusive in their analyses and had not chosen a specific route to building this understanding.

Suppose an organization has been advised by its agency or technology supplier that it needs a 360-degree view of the customer in order to implement CRM activities. The reality might actually be entirely different, depending on factors such as industry sector, nature of customer base or nature of existing technology infrastructure. The point is that companies need to build the single view they need, and improve it over time as business requirements dictate. For example, a start-up e-bank sector might find it needs a complete view of its customers available in real time, and it might even find that this view is relatively easy to attain, as it has no legacy systems or unclear issues to resolve. Another organization that relies on an intermediary sales channel might find that while it desires a 360-degree view of the customer for market and customer analysis and planning, it does not immediately need to be in real time since it is being used in offline data mining.

So the 360-degree view is in fact a moving target, and the key is building an understanding of what is actually required by the organization, what can be done, and at what price. The end result is almost certainly different for every organization that goes through such an exercise.