 Sections
Syndication |
|
|
|
|
The Need for Written Policies
The Need for
Written Policies
Headlines continue to point to the need to have formal
policies governing the operation of a CI unit, as well as of consultants and
contractors working for that unit. [26] Of course, CI professionals have to be very careful
to avoid crossing either legal or ethical boundaries when
collecting data for any intelligence program. In fact, it is not necessary to be illegal or unethical to conduct effective
CI. As was noted, 80 percent (or more) of what a company needs to know about its
competitors is easily available through legal, ethical means. Therefore, any
"perceived" need for information that cannot be obtained by legal, ethical means
should be very small. When weighed against the potential for damaging business
relationships and reputations, the potential benefits of getting such
information can never outweigh the potential harm.
In spite of the media's frequent failure to accept this, there is a distinct and critical difference between competitive
intelligence and what we commonly call industrial espionage. Industrial
espionage involves violating either criminal or civil laws to collect data. For
example, stealing samples from a locked conference room at a trade show
constitutes industrial espionage under this standard. On the other hand,
accepting samples freely handed out to the general public at the trade show is
perfectly legitimate.
In some instances, a gray area may exist between industrial
espionage and legitimate intelligence collection efforts. In these instances, we
are dealing with taking actions that are not strictly illegal, but that still
could violate a reasonable corporate conduct policy or ethical standards. Taking
our example one step further, what do you think of someone soliciting samples at
a trade show while using a badge that (falsely) labels them as a potential
distributor? Does it make a difference if the samples are being given to
everyone, anyway? Without a clear directive as to what is in the "gray zone" of
unethical behavior, it is all too easy to slide right through into the "black
zone" of illegal activity. [27]
There are positive benefits to having an
ethical policy that applies to how the CI unit operates, whether or not it deals
directly with CI by name. Here are a few:
-
By developing a statement of ethical standards to complement
legal ones, management sends a message to employees that the company expects
more from them than the bare minimum of "Don't break the law."
-
There is a direct link between the presence of a corporate
ethics/business conduct policy and awareness of the limits of legal and ethical
behavior on the part of CI practitioners. [28] And while research has shown a direct relationship
between a CI professional's perception of legal
constraints and the success of the CI function, the relationship is not what
some CI professionals would have expected. Executives give a higher rating to the performance of CI functions, as well as
the results to their firm, when the CI professional's perception of legal
constraints was higher! [29]
-
One of the lessons that emerged from the SCIP Team
Excellence Awards process during its 1999–2000 test period dealt with efforts to
train employees on what such policies mean in the context of CI.
-
This training also alerts both legal personnel and corporate
CI personnel to the real issues involved in conducting CI, before they can cause
problems.
-
Looking at the "open source" hierarchy (discussed earlier in
this chapter), it is interesting to note the relative "costs" associated with each type of
data. If we take open source information (representing 80 percent of the
information available on a target) as a baseline of 100 percent, then open
proprietary information, which adds 5 percent, does so at a cost equal to 50
percent of what was already spent on open source information. "Closed
proprietary," which could also be defined as information obtained through
activities of dubious ethical stature as well as some that cross the line, could
provide 5 percent, but at a cost equal to what was spent on open source
information. The final category, "classified," which is acquired almost
exclusively through illegal operations, represents the last 10 percent of the
information available on a target but typically costs 2.5 times what was spent
on open source information. [30] Therefore, behavior that is unethical (or worse) is
not only not proper, it is not even cost-effective.
-
Any ethical statement, whether or not it is based on the
SCIP Code, [31] also
provides an external measuring stick. That is, if your firm is hiring a CI
consultant, it should ask that the contractor be bound by the client's own
standards. In addition, having your own set of written standard permits you to
ask the potential contractor to discuss its own standards with you and compare
the fit, or lack of fit, with your own.
In other words, CI involves the legal and ethical collection of data. It is more than a practice
that is merely "not illegal." And operating both legally and ethically is not
only the moral way to conduct business, it is also good business.
78
times read
|
|
|
Did you enjoy this article?
(total 0 votes)
|
Comments (0 posted) Please Comment On This Article
|