Super Business - Project Management Articles


Sections
Syndication



Selecting the Right Way to Present CI


Selecting the Right Way to Present CI

As detailed in Chapter 13 and in Bottom Line Competitive Intelligence, [10] there is a very significant link between the orientation of CI that you are providing and the optimal ways to communicate that to the end users. However, regardless of the manner in which the CI will be communicated, there are trade-offs to be made in the way that you provide it.

Your decision about the appropriate manner of communication will always involve trade-offs among the following factors:

  • being current or providing some perspective

  • being easy to understand or perhaps being less precise

  • being complete and thorough or avoiding subjecting the users to "information overload"

  • being able to be absorbed rapidly or lacking in detail

  • using "headlines" with short summaries or transmitting careful analyses

  • providing free access to important CI or maintaining the confidentiality of the analysis and sources of raw data

The form you select for disseminating CI should transmit the conclusions reached to the end users in the most effective manner possible. There is no one right form. CI may be communicated orally, in writing, in graphic form, or in some combination of these. The key is to select the option or options will help the end users be most to receive, retain and understand the CI.

Oral Communications. An oral presentation, whether a formal briefing or just a conference call, is quick and permits CI to be communicated to a large number of end users at once. It also allows the analyst communicating the CI to keep it extremely current and, by answering questions, to cover areas not included in the original presentation. Its flexibility allows the CI professional to communicate in ways that a written document cannot. [11] However, it has a significant disadvantage because miscommunications can occur more easily with oral communications than with either written or graphic communications. In fact, it is sometimes argued that spoken communications are received differently than are written communications. [12]

Another disadvantage of an oral presentation is that usually there is no permanent record that the CI was provided to the end user nor any description of what that CI was. The lack of a record of the providing of the CI may make it difficult or even impossible to evaluate its effectiveness at a later date. The lack of any record may also hinder the end users seeking to use the CI because they may need to refer again to some element of the presentation. Retransmission of what was communicated in the first instance carries with it the high likelihood that important elements will be omitted and that errors will creep in. In addition, the presenter does not have an exact record of what was said. Finally, this lack of permanence makes it difficult for either the presenter or the end users to build on that CI in the future.

While the PowerPoint®-style slide presentation would, at first glance, appear to overcome many of the shortcomings of the purely oral presentation, that is not necessarily true, for several reasons:

Written Communications. Written communications take longer than oral ones, if for no other reason than it takes longer to write something down than to say it. However, once it is in written form, the CI will not change its content when it is transmitted from one end user to another, unlike oral communications. Also, written communications can be reproduced or, in the case of e-mails, even be sent to many end users at once. However, keep in mind that the wider the distribution of written CI, the more likely it is that this CI will be available to persons, or even organizations, for whom it was never intended.

Written communications also can be extremely precise or easily read, depending on the analyst's choice. Written communications also have the advantage that they can be reviewed before communication happens, stored and retrieved, or even updated. They also create a permanent audit trail for those who want to evaluate the real impact of CI on a firm.

Graphic Communications. The use of graphics in communicating CI can sometimes be quite effective. In fact, using graphic aids such as charts or illustrations in a written report or as a part of an oral presentation can enhance the overall message.

  • You can emphasize particularly critical points or concepts by presenting material in two different ways.

  • You can make it easier to understand complex numeric comparisons.

  • You can give individuals at a presentation something to take with them, such as a copy of the charts and graphics, without having to distribute the full text of the presentation.

The methods you select depends on the need for clarity, accuracy, speed, and security. An oral presentation, for example, may be quick to prepare and present, but it may be difficult to have end users grasp complex financial relationships merely by hearing a recitation of data. A graphic can help clarify comparisons of data, but preparing complete and understandable graphics may require more time than is available. In CI, as in many other areas of business, timeliness determines whether information is useful. Precise information that arrives late may be less desirable than a rough approximation that is available on schedule.


175 times read

Related news

» Videoconferencing of Project Management
by admin posted on Nov 11,2010
» Project Management Remote Presentations
by admin posted on Nov 11,2010
» Overall Drafting Suggestions
by admin posted on Feb 09,2010
» Communications Planning: Tools and Techniques
by admin posted on Aug 26,2010
» Sustain Effective Communications
by admin posted on Oct 03,2007
Did you enjoy this article?
(total 0 votes)

comment Comments (0 posted) 
Please Comment On This Article