Selecting the
Right Way to Present CI
As detailed in Chapter 13 and in Bottom Line
Competitive Intelligence, [10] there is a very significant link between the
orientation of CI that you are providing and the optimal ways to communicate
that to the end users. However, regardless of the manner in which the CI will be
communicated, there are trade-offs to be made in the way that you provide
it.
Your decision about the appropriate manner of communication will
always involve trade-offs among the following factors:
-
being current or providing some perspective
-
being easy to understand or perhaps being less precise
-
being complete and thorough or avoiding subjecting the users
to "information overload"
-
being able to be absorbed rapidly or lacking in detail
-
using "headlines" with short summaries or transmitting
careful analyses
-
providing free access to important CI or maintaining the
confidentiality of the analysis and sources of raw data
The form you select for disseminating CI should transmit the
conclusions reached to the end users in the most effective manner possible.
There is no one right form. CI may be communicated orally, in writing, in
graphic form, or in some combination of these. The key is to select the option
or options will help the end users be most to receive, retain and understand the
CI.
Oral Communications. An oral presentation,
whether a formal briefing or just a conference call, is quick and permits CI to
be communicated to a large number of end users at once. It also allows the
analyst communicating the CI to keep it extremely current and, by answering
questions, to cover areas not included in the original presentation. Its
flexibility allows the CI professional to communicate in ways that a written
document cannot. [11]
However, it has a significant disadvantage because miscommunications can occur
more easily with oral communications than with either written or graphic
communications. In fact, it is sometimes argued that spoken communications are
received differently than are written communications. [12]
Another disadvantage of an oral presentation is that usually there
is no permanent record that the CI was provided to the end user nor any
description of what that CI was. The lack of a record of the providing of the CI
may make it difficult or even impossible to evaluate its effectiveness at a
later date. The lack of any record may also hinder the end users seeking to use
the CI because they may need to refer again to some element of the presentation.
Retransmission of what was communicated in the first instance carries with it
the high likelihood that important elements will be omitted and that errors will
creep in. In addition, the presenter does not have an exact record of what was
said. Finally, this lack of permanence makes it difficult for either the
presenter or the end users to build on that CI in the future.
While the PowerPoint®-style slide presentation would, at first
glance, appear to overcome many of the shortcomings of the purely oral
presentation, that is not necessarily true, for several reasons:
-
Preparing a PowerPoint presentation takes time, sometime
more time than writing out a formal document.
-
Communicating complex relationships and large amounts of
detailed data, particularly financial data, is not always easily accomplished in
this context.
-
While end users do have a document to take with them, it is,
in essence, only an outline. Either the presenter must put all key conclusions
on the overheads, or the end users must rely on the notes that they take to
complete the delivery of the CI.
-
PowerPoint presentations are subject to their own rules for
enhancing effectiveness. [13] Unfortunately, most people giving presentations do
not follow these rules.
Written Communications. Written
communications take longer than oral ones, if for no other reason than it takes
longer to write something down than to say it. However, once it is in written
form, the CI will not change its content when it is transmitted from one end
user to another, unlike oral communications. Also, written communications can be
reproduced or, in the case of e-mails, even be sent to many end users at once.
However, keep in mind that the wider the distribution of written CI, the more
likely it is that this CI will be available to persons, or even organizations,
for whom it was never intended.
Written communications also can be extremely precise or easily
read, depending on the analyst's choice. Written communications also have the
advantage that they can be reviewed before communication happens, stored and
retrieved, or even updated. They also create a permanent audit trail for those
who want to evaluate the real impact of CI on a firm.
Graphic Communications. The use of graphics
in communicating CI can sometimes be quite effective. In fact, using graphic
aids such as charts or illustrations in a written report or as a part of an oral
presentation can enhance the overall message.
-
You can emphasize particularly critical points or concepts
by presenting material in two different ways.
-
You can make it easier to understand complex numeric
comparisons.
-
You can give individuals at a presentation something to take
with them, such as a copy of the charts and graphics, without having to
distribute the full text of the presentation.
The methods you select depends on the need for clarity,
accuracy, speed, and security. An oral presentation, for example, may be quick
to prepare and present, but it may be difficult to have end users grasp complex
financial relationships merely by hearing a recitation of data. A graphic can
help clarify comparisons of data, but preparing complete and understandable
graphics may require more time than is available. In CI, as in many other areas
of business, timeliness determines whether information is useful. Precise
information that arrives late may be less desirable than a rough approximation
that is available on schedule.