Relationship
between CI and Market Research
As indicated, a significant percentage (over 20 percent) of
CI professionals polled indicated that their manager's area of work was market
planning, research, or analysis. That raises the question of whether CI should,
as a general rule, be considered as a part of market research and therefore
located in that department.
At present, the differences between CI and market research are
more profound than are the similarities (see Table 4.2, page 36).
Table 4.2: Difference between CI and Market
Research
| |
Competitive Intelligence
|
Market Research |
|
Typical Focus |
External |
External |
|
Typical Orientation |
Strategy-, tactics-, technology-, and/or
target-oriented |
Tactics-oriented |
|
Typical Tools |
Qualitative and quantitative |
Largely quantitative |
|
Source of Tools |
Adapted from market research, planning, benchmarking, and so
on. |
Largely developed first for market research |
|
Relative Perspectives |
Macro- and micro-level |
Largely micro-level |
|
Time Horizons |
Historical, current, and long-term future |
Historical and current; occasionally near term
future |
|
Targeting |
Constantly redefined by end users |
Relatively stable |
The result of these differences is that CI is often a poor fit in
a market research department, and conversely, market research is also a poor fit
within a CI unit. This conclusion is supported by a recent benchmarking survey
which found that "When CI personnel had both market intelligence and marketing
research responsibilities, the marketing research responsibilities took
precedence (90%) and the intelligence shifted to a secondary function." [6] The one exception may be
tactics-oriented CI, where the process typically supports marketing efforts. In
such cases, so long as managers recognize the critical differences in approach
and attitude between typical market research and typical CI, they can work
within the same unit.
However, that does not mean that CI and market research should be
operating independently of each other. Experience clearly demonstrates otherwise. For example, in the CI unit at PacBell,
the market research and information research (internal information brokers)
functions now all have established mechanisms for transferring critical
information through networking.
One example where the synergy between [these three] groups
was valuable was when [PacBell] was trying to determine what its level of
involvement in the cable TV market should be. One of the pieces that affected
the decision whether or not to create a cable TV subsidiary was put in place
when market research determined that customers would switch cable companies if
they had an option. From a competitive perspective that was the basis of entry
into a new marketplace. [7]