The
Interpersonal Realm
If the intrapersonal realm is complex then one need only
think a moment to imagine how complex the interpersonal world is. Intrapersonal
dynamics are, much of the time, directed toward others or energized by the
actions of others relative to us. The interpersonal world is filled with many
dynamics that have been explored in many different ways. Others starting at
infancy become the focal points for many intrapersonal dynamics that leak out
into relating to others, who may at first only be known in a fragmented and
tentative way often described as part object relations (Ogden, 1989). This
primitive side of life arises when a person such as the mother of the infant is
experienced by the infant as good at one moment by offering nurturance and bad
at another time by withholding nurturance. Early object relations are described
as “part” in that the good mother is known to be different from the bad mother.
There are two mothers in this example. As the infant develops he or she
gradually comes to appreciate that there is but one mother with both good and
bad attributes. This much more integrated understanding is described as “whole”
object relations that introduce the depressive state. The infant is no longer in
control of his or her objects and more importantly, objects (others) can have
two or more conflicting attributes. The good mother and the bad mother are, in
effect, lost to the mother as a unified person. However, part object relations
are always accessible and may reappear if stressful conditions induce
psychological regression.
Interpersonal dynamics implicitly incorporate the intrapsychic
world thereby filling relationships with others with many hard to understand
elements, tensions and hidden agendas. For example, a child who experienced
considerable physical and psychological abuse at the hands of his or her mother
may very well be highly sensitized to other women who have attributes that
remind the person of his or her mother. This interpersonal dynamic may be
fuelled by splitting and projection thereby creating an “all bad” other. This
tendency may be further generalized to include anyone’s behavior including male
behavior that reminds the person of his or her mother’s painful behavior. The
result is that distressing self-experience from the past is transferred onto the
present, creating the proverbial “hot button.” The response becomes
disproportionate to the circumstance. Other aspects of interpersonal dynamics
that may be encountered in the workplace are the pursuit of fulfilling excessive
dependency needs or needs to withdraw from relating to others altogether.
In Sum
Individual psychology combines with the interpersonal world
to create a middle ground or potential space between individuals who aspire to
relate to each other that is filled with many hard to know and understand
individual and interpersonal dynamics. As a result we are left with extremely
hard to manage workplace dynamics that defy management when psychological “hot
buttons” create explosive interpersonal relations.