Super Business - Project Management Articles


Sections
Syndication



Decision with Dependent Conditions Alternative ID


Decision with Dependent Conditions

Alternative ID

Description

Probability Sponsor Exercises Option

Probability of Sponsor Decision, SD, Late

Probability of 20-Day Schedule Delay

Face Value of Delay, D, @ $10,000 per Day

EV of Delay, D (p of SD * p of Delay * $Face Value)

EV of Acquisition Cost (p of Option * $Face Value * D)

Expected Value of Alternative

A

MAKE

 

0.3 Late

0.3 Late

0.67 Yes

0.33 No

$200,000 Yes

$0 No

$40,200 $0

 

= 0.75 * ($40,200

   

0.75 Yes

       

= $125,000 * 0.75

+ $84,000) + $93,750

A

MAKE

 

0.7 On time

0.7 On time

0.6 Yes

0.3 No

$200,000 Yes

$0 No

$84,000 $0

= $93,750

= $186,900

A

MAKE

0.25 No

0.25 No

 

0.6 Yes

0.4 No

$200,000 Yes

$0 No

$0

$0

$0

B

BUY

 

0.3 Late

0.3 Late

0.23 Yes

0.77 No

$200,000 Yes

$0 No

$13,800

$0

 

= 0.75 * ($13,800

   

0.75 Yes

       

= $200,000 * 0.75

+ $28,000) + $150,000

B

BUY

 

0.7 On time

0.7 On time

0.2 Yes

0.8 No

$200,000 Yes

$0 No

$28,000 $0

= $150,000

= $181,350

B

BUY

0.25 No

0.25 No

 

0.2 Yes

0.8 No

$200,000 Yes

$0 No

$0

$0

$0

Note further that the decision to make or buy is not changed by the effect of a late decision of the sponsor. "Buy" comes out more advantageous in the face of a dependent condition with the sponsor's decision. The upside and downside of a decision in favor of "Buy" are:

Upside of an on-time sponsor's decision is the "Buy" acquisition cost = $200,000

Downside of late sponsor's decision = $181,350 - ($200,000 + $200,000) = -$218,650



169 times read

Related news

» Manufacturing company: customer management competency framework
by admin posted on Jul 20,2008
» Efficiency
by admin posted on Aug 15,2010
» Marketing of a New Product Purpose And Scope
by admin posted on Oct 03,2007
» Break-Even Analysis
by admin posted on Aug 15,2010
» A Comprehensive Example
by admin posted on Aug 15,2010