Case study
description
The case study concerns a financial services organization
that undertook a strategic review and decided that it needed to reinvigorate the
brand. With the previous case study we focused on gaining internal alignment to
the organizational service. This case study takes a different perspective. The
key focus of this rebranding exercise was the external marketing of the products
and services on offer, and the way that customer-facing staff represented the
brand. This is best illustrated by Wasmer and Bruner’s research (1991) which
maps the relationship flows between the customer, the organization and the
customer service provider (see Figure
7.2). They saw the major constituents of their brand as:
As a result of the strategic review the organization decided that
the key to its competitive advantage was the way in which its customer-facing
employees transacted with customers and
potential customers. They were referring to not just the usual types of customer
service behaviour such as greeting, courtesy and complaint handling but also the
ways that the brand itself was being portrayed. The customer does not just
receive communication from the organization in terms of its marketing and its
goods. It also receives information via the customer service providers.
To focus more clearly on its target audience, the organization
segmented its potential customer market into four quadrants based on their
interest in financial services and their level of self-knowledge of financial
needs and potential solutions. One quadrant of the market was generally
knowledgeable and sophisticated. Another quadrant had a high interest in the
financial area of their lives but relatively little knowledge. The third
quadrant had a reasonable knowledge base but this was not accompanied by any
great level of interest. The final quadrant had little interest and little
knowledge (see Figure 7.3).
This segmentation generated a number of questions:
-
What type of advice was best suited to each quadrant?
-
Did the organization want to deliver that sort of
advice?
-
What was the organizational capability to deliver that
advice (profitably)?
-
Could the organization be developed to bridge any
gaps?
The areas that showed most promise were those potential customers
who either were interested in investing in their financial future but needed
help in negotiating their way through the financial maze, or did not have the
interest but wanted someone to do it for them, and do it well. These were the
‘Show it to me!’ and ‘Do it for me!’ customers.
Although those in the High–High quadrant were generally high net
worth individuals, the people who fell into that category wanted a high level of
service but were also more liable to shift their savings and investments from
one financial institution to another fairly frequently. The Low–Low quadrant
likewise required a high level of support but did not necessarily have the
available funds to warrant that level of investment from the organization.
Once the primary focus for business development opportunities had
been established, the next stage was to decide what sorts of things needed to
happen for customer needs to be satisfied. This included outlining the
behaviours and attitudes that customer-facing staff (and those back-office staff
supporting them) needed to exhibit. Key areas included the ability to generate
interest, to establish credibility, to have clarity of communication and to be
proactive to customer needs.
The reorientation of the company to this particular strategy
included the generation of a new set of company values. These values were not
just a list of slogans but were translated into behavioural statements. These
statements defined the preferred way of operating in the business and indeed
also became part of the recruitment process.
The values were not only ‘nice-to-have’ or ‘motherhood and apple
pie’, but were designed to align people within the organization to the company
strategy and the preferred behaviours. So for example a value of ‘treat people
well’ was translated into making people feel they are your number one priority,
and treating all customers and each other with respect. The value of ‘say it as
it is’ was translated into talking to customers and colleagues in a
straightforward manner. These behaviours could be verified by observation or
customer feedback. They could also be learnt.
Of course to get to the stage where frontline staff behaved in
accordance with company strategy required other enabling actions, which were
drawn from best practice and appropriate models of individual, team and
organizational change