OVERVIEW
If you were asked to give a new recruit some words of
encouragement on how to be successful within your organization, what would you
say? You might give some formal advice about carrying your ID at all times, but
you might also make some of the following suggestions:
Keep your head down.
It’s OK to make mistakes here, as long as you don’t repeat
them.
The boss likes to see you working really hard at all times.
We work hard but play hard. The people who get on here work
long
hours but enjoy themselves in the pub afterwards.
It doesn’t pay to ask too many questions.
You’ll find everyone pulls together here and will want to see
you as part of the team.
With this helpful advice, you begin to educate the person about
the way things get done around the organization. You also reveal what some of
the required behaviours are, and thus you actively reinforce the prevailing
culture.
As Schein (1990) says, culture is the ‘the pattern of basic
assumptions that a given group has invented, discovered or developed in learning
to cope with its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, and
that have worked well enough to be considered valid and, therefore, to be taught
to new members as the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to
those problems.’
Culture is not just about induction programmes, it is everywhere
in organizational life. Culture is vitally important for the organization
because of its impact on performance. Molenaar et al
(2002), quoting leading writers in the field, say:
[T]o truly understand corporate culture, its characteristics
must also be understood.
The following is a compilation of the most prevalent cultural
characteristics:
-
Corporate culture represents behaviors that new employees
are encouraged to follow (Kotter and Heskett, 1992)
-
It creates norms for acceptable behavior (Hai, 1986)
-
Corporate culture reinforces ideas and feelings that are
consistent with the corporation’s beliefs (Hampden-Turner, 1990)
-
It influences the external relations of the corporation, as
well as the internal relations of the employees (Hai, 1986)
-
Culture can have a powerful effect on individuals and
performance (Kotter and Heskett, 1992)
-
It affects worker motivation and goals (Hai, 1986)
-
Behaviors such as innovation, decision making,
communication, organizing, measuring success and rewarding achievement are
affected by corporate culture (Hai, 1986).
If we want to learn about how to change culture, we need to
understand how it is created. Schein (1999) suggests that there are six
different ways in which culture evolves. Some of these can be influenced by
leaders and some cannot:
-
A general evolution in which the organization naturally
adapts to its environment.
-
A specific evolution of teams or sub-groups within the
organization to their different environments.
-
A guided evolution resulting from cultural ‘insights’ on the
part of leaders.
-
A guided evolution through encouraging teams to learn from
each other, and empowering selected hybrids from sub-cultures that are better
adapted to current realities.
-
A planned and managed culture change through creation of
parallel systems of steering committees and project-oriented task forces.
-
A partial or total cultural destruction through new
leadership that eliminates the carriers of the former culture (turnarounds,
bankruptcies, etc).
Schein underscores the fact that organizations will not
successfully change culture if they begin with that specific idea in mind. The
starting point should always be the business
issues that the organization faces. Additionally he suggests that you do not
begin with the idea that the existing culture is somehow totally ‘bad’. He urges
leaders to always begin with the premise that an organization’s culture is a
source of strength. Some of the cultural habits may seem dysfunctional but it is
more viable to build on the existing cultural strengths rather than to focus on
changing those elements that may be considered weaknesses.
This chapter focuses on culture in the context of managing change.
We have chosen not to discuss concepts and theories of organizational culture as
this is done so well elsewhere (see the reference list to get you started). We
have instead decided to share our tips and guidelines on achieving culture
change. These are derived from a variety of experiences of working within
organizations, helping teams and individuals to make significant cultural
shifts. We have also selected three case studies to illustrate the range of ways
in which culture change can be tackled. The structure of this chapter is:
-
Guidelines for achieving successful cultural change.
-
Case study one: aligning the organization.
-
Case study two: rebranding the organization.
-
Case study three: creating an employer brand.
We wish to introduce the concept of ‘rebranding’ as a way of
exploring cultural change. Our three case studies each take a slightly different
approach to the process of rebranding. The first concerns the challenge of
aligning the organization more closely to customer needs, the second is about
reflecting the brand in everyday employee interactions with customers, and the
third is about creating an employer brand to enable the organization to attract
and retain the best staff, and to engage the energy and motivation of all
employees.
Extensive academic research in the 1990s (see for instance Kohli
and Jaworski, 1990) has consistently found that organizations with a strong
market focus and brand presence experience better performance, based on measures
such as sales revenue, profitability, growth rates and return on investment.
Additionally a strong market focus has a number of related benefits including
developing strong organizational culture, success in developing new products and
services, sales force job satisfaction and offering a source of competitive
advantage. This approach also aligns with our view that any culture change
initiative must have sound customer-focused objectives at its core.
Internal rebranding is sometimes referred to as internal
marketing. Greene, Walls and Schrest (1994) define internal marketing as ‘the
promoting of the firm and its product(s) or
product lines to the firm’s employees’. Berry and Parasuraman’s (1991)
definition is ‘internal marketing is attracting, developing, motivating, and
retaining qualified employees through job-products that satisfy their needs.
Internal marketing is the philosophy of treating employees as customers.’
However, although these definitions both point us in the right direction, the
important end goal is to ensure that the key components of the brand are
communicated to customers and the wider external audience. The brand must
therefore be understood, believed and exemplified by customer-facing staff,
supported by the rest of the organization.
Crosby and Johnson (2001) conclude:
The strongest brands are those that elicit emotional
attachment from customers. When interacting with your company, customers and
prospects may have feelings of safety, pride, excitement, comfort, confidence,
caring, or trust. These interactions activate feelings and build strong brand
commitment.
… it’s important not to overlook
the effects of brand on the employees of the firm. Employees often have a large
role to play in managing customer relationships, and the brand can help guide
their behaviour. In effect, the brand is a promise to customers of how they can
expect to be treated by the company. To the extent employees understand the
expectations being created by the brand, and are motivated and trained to live
up to those expectations, then the firm can have a truly integrated customer
relationship management strategy.