Summary of
psychodynamic approach
The psychodynamic approach is useful for managers who want
to understand the reactions of their staff during a change process and deal with
them. These models allow managers to gain an understanding of why people react
the way they do. It identifies what is going on in the inner world of their
staff when they encounter change.
As with all models, the ones we have described simplify what can
be quite a complex process. Individuals do not necessarily know that they are
going through different phases. What they may experience is a range of different
emotions (or lack of emotion), which may cluster together into different
groupings which could be labelled one thing or another. Any observer, at the
time, might see manifestations of these different emotions played out in the
individual’s behaviour.
Research suggests that these different phases may well overlap,
with the predominant emotion of one stage gradually diminishing over time as a
predominant emotion of the next stage takes hold. For example the deep sense of
loss and associated despondency, while subsiding over time, might well swell up
again and engulf the individual with grief, either for no apparent reason, or
because of a particular anniversary, contact with a particular individual or an
external event reported on the news.
Individuals will go through a process which, either in hindsight
or from an observer’s point of view, will have a number of different phases
which themselves are delineated in time and by different characteristics.
However the stages themselves will not necessarily have clear beginnings or
endings, and characteristics from one stage may appear in other stages.
Satir’s model incorporates the idea of a defining event – the
transforming idea – that can be seen to change, or be the beginning of the
change for, an individual. It may well be an insight, or waking up one morning
and sensing that a cloud had been lifted. From that point on there is a
qualitative difference in the person undergoing change. He or she can see the
light at the end of the tunnel, or have a sense that there is a future
direction.
Key learnings here are that everyone to some extent goes through
the highs and lows of the transitions curve, although perhaps in different times
and in different ways. It is not only perfectly natural and normal but actually
an essential part of being human.
STOP AND THINK!
|
1.8 |
Think of a current or recent change in your
organization.
-
Can you map the progress of the change on to Satir’s or
Weinberg’s model?
-
At what points did the change falter?
-
At what points did it accelerate?
-
What factors contributed in each case? |