Header
Home | Set as homepage | Add to favorites
  Search the Site     » Advanced Search
Sections
Syndication



Managing Different Knowledge Types

by

image

 

Managing Different Knowledge Types

Managing general and specialised knowledge is one of the problems faced by construction consulting companies. Many companies, this one included, tend to follow a relatively ‘generalist' approach to work assignments among technical professionals, whereby staff members will end up working on a huge range of projects and tasks within their particular discipline. While this is considered an appropriate approach in a business where no two jobs are ever the same, and where the range of jobs undertaken is too wide to justify employment of teams of specifically qualified individuals, there is still room to introduce elements of specialisation. Requiring many staff across the organisation to possess or acquire certain knowledge, which they may need at some stage, but not continually, represents an over-investment in that knowledge. It is more efficient to promote one (or more) individuals to specialise in selected areas, and to communicate that specialisation to the other members of the organisation (through mechanisms discussed above). Certainly the ability to tap into a wider pool of expertise should be one of the significant benefits of belonging to a larger organisation. Identification of potential areas for development of specialisation is best done at lower levels of the organisation and coordinated between offices across the company. These need not be major areas of technical expertise, but even more general aspects of the regular business of a discipline. For example, mechanical engineers could be nominated to specialise in areas such as pumps, control valves, or pipe support systems. This aspect of knowledge management obviously ties in with issues of employee training and development. Should such a specialist leave the company, there is certainly a resulting loss of knowledge, however the extent of this loss will be minimised if the individual has been actively sharing their knowledge with their peers in the normal course of carrying out their work, and has codified aspects of their knowledge through drawings and documentation which they have produced or contributed to while in that role. Having such identified specialists in the company allows them to be used as a resource for the entire firm in areas such as reviewing specific relevant sections of project documentation. It ensures a consistent and correct output from each specific knowledge area, and also provides a readily identifiable target for project-related feedback in their area of expertise. The specialist should be responsible for updating standard documents to reflect the evolving knowledge of the organisation.


154 times read

Related news

» Knowledge Management Systems in a Project-Driven Environment
by admin posted on Jan 10,2008
» A Company Knowledge Management Problem Identified
by admin posted on Jan 10,2008
» Identifying Knowledge Holders and Capturing Feedback
by admin posted on Jan 10,2008
» Communicating Captured Knowledge
by admin posted on Jan 10,2008
» Coordination, Control, and Use of Knowledge
by admin posted on Jan 10,2008


More Top News
International Project Management
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Author