Transnational aspects of corporate strategy
 
Transnational
aspects of corporate strategy
Certain tools and techniques of corporate strategy
contribute to the effectiveness of organizational functioning, irrespective of
culture. Practically all the global managers interviewed for this book concur
that the following techniques of corporate strategy can be adopted in any
culture.
Action planning
This ensures that the various strategies formulated by a
transnational corporation are implemented in every culture, and the appropriate
managers are held accountable for their responsibilities.
Action planning is particularly efficacious if it is formulated in
a clear fashion. This reduces misinterpretations arising out of cultural
differences. Generally, the first step in action planning is conceptualizing how
the project should be executed from beginning to end. This is followed by a
description of how each project task is to be performed. The description
contains the names of managers who will perform the tasks, as well as those who
will provide support functions. Care should be taken to ensure that all the
necessary tasks have been included.
At this stage, the MASTERS criteria referred to by Cushway and Lodge
(1999) can be used. The acronym MASTERS stands for measurable, achievable,
specific, time related, encompassing, realistic, and stretching. These criteria
are used to assess whether the task descriptions have been formulated
properly.
The next step is to ensure that everybody's assumptions about
the business programme being operationalized are congruent. The tasks then have
to be arranged in a proper sequence, with the tasks that have to be completed
before subsequent tasks can be started being performed first. Tasks that can be
performed parallel to other tasks should be identified as well. The time
required for the execution of each task also has to be gauged and recorded. The
date on which each task has to be initiated and completed has to be noted. The
managers and other resources required for task completion have then to be
deployed. Finally, the managers have to decide on a reasonable time frame for
reviewing the action steps.
The balanced scorecard
This is a corporate strategy tool that has been developed by
Kaplan and Norton
(1996) so that global companies can be more competitive in modern times.
This tool enables global companies to optimize the use of their intangible
assets. The balanced scorecard also places a lot of emphasis on the key drivers
of a company's performance. This enables planners to focus their efforts instead
of spreading themselves thin by trying to fulfil too many objectives.
Kaplan and Norton recommend four key measures. These are the
customer perspective, the internal perspective, the innovation and learning
perspective, and the financial perspective. The customer perspective is
concerned with how the global company is perceived by its customers in all the
cultures in which it has operations. The internal perspective examines the
extent to which the global company is leveraging its core competencies. The
innovation and learning perspective is concerned with continuous improvement.
The financial perspective investigates whether the financial performance of the
company is aligned to shareholder expectations.
Kaplan and Norton assert that the balanced scorecard is being used
with telling effect. It enables global corporations to update strategies,
communicate strategies effectively to all their branches in different cultures,
align the goals of branches in different cultures to the corporate strategy,
align strategies with long-term goals, conduct periodic reviews and take
remedial action if necessary.
Kaplan and Norton have also argued that the balanced
scorecard can be used for developing a global corporation's long-term strategy.
Usually, there are four stages involved: one, translating the vision; two,
communicating and linking; three, business planning; and four, feedback and
learning. Translating the vision involves obtaining the necessary commitment to
accomplish the strategy from branches in all cultures. It also entails getting
managers from various branches to agree what the corporate strategy should be.
Communicating and linking refers to communicating the strategy to all employees
worldwide, and tying up rewards with performance measures. Business planning
entails the establishment of appropriate milestones to gauge progress, as well
as the setting of achievable targets. Feedback and learning is achieved through
strategic feedback and strategic learning.
124 times read
|
|
|
|