Equivalence of Response
Balancing long- and short-term feedback is the key to
success. Delivering immediate financial results must not come at the expense of
the future viability of the business. This means that Strategic Alternatives
must respond to market changes in a manner that is consistent with the nature of
the changes. How do you measure the potential impact of market changes? Two
factors can be used to understand impact— permanency and risk.
Permanency
Permanency of the change
can be judged along a continuum. The extremes of the continuum are structural
and aberrant (Exhibit
4-1). Structural changes reflect permanent changes in the marketplace. These
changes may cause a company to reshape its strategy. An illustration of a
structural change is the globalization of the U.S. economy. Globalization of
markets has forced companies to rethink their business models. Companies have
changed the way they do business to accommodate customers from different
countries.
Exhibit 4-1: Permanency of change.
Aberrant changes are short-lived in nature. Short-term spikes
in interest rates are examples of aberrant changes. Short-term changes can be
accommodated by modifications in the resource structure of the company such as
short-term joint ventures to accommodate demand.
Risk
If the economic data indicates that your firm's value will
decline or not grow as forecasted, a risk has been identified. The risks to the
viability of the business will gauge a company's response to economic issues. If
the risk is high, a company must respond by strategic repositioning. For
example, significant declines in prices may portend overheated competition in a
particular marketplace. Is this a structural change in the pricing dynamics of the marketplace? Is the market becoming
more volatile? Will this lead to long-term erosion of profits and shareholder
value? If the answer to the majority of these questions is yes, then choosing
Strategic Alternatives that change your company's market position is
appropriate. This may call for an overhaul of your business model, or an
acquisition of competitors.
Strategic Alternatives that overcompensate for change will
destroy value. A drastic change to a business model may be costly and difficult
to implement. Dedication to attainable and forward-thinking goals creates
competitive advantages. New initiatives need to be realistic and require careful
coordination with the strategic, financial, and operating plans. Since
competitive advantages are not permanent, how long will the advantage
exist?