Super Business - Project Management Articles


Sections
Syndication



The Balanced Scorecard


The Balanced Scorecard

The Balanced Scorecard

Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton developed the Balanced Scorecard. It was designed to more effectively turn strategic plans into action. The scorecard creates a way to measure performance in strategic terms. It is not only a way to benchmark the performance of a company, but it is a process as well. The scorecard involves continual evaluation of four key areas, or quadrants, as well as assessment of the actual metrics themselves. The process occurs at all levels of management. The four quadrants are financial, customer, internal business process, and learning and growth, which were identified by Kaplan and Norton as areas that are key to business success (Exhibit 5-5).

Exhibit 5-5: The Balanced Scoreboard.

The Financial Quadrant

The financial quadrant of the scorecard measures performance in three major categories: 1) revenue growth, 2) productivity, and 3) return on investment. These categories are linked to the maturity of your business. The maturity of a business closely parallels the development of industries. Jackson proposes three stages of the industry lifecycle.[1] Financial metrics are summarized in Exhibit 5-6.

The Learning and Growth Quadrant

"The objectives of the learning and growth perspective provide the infrastructure to enable ambitious objectives in the other three perspectives to be achieved".[2] Kaplan and Cooper believe that this area is the key to long-term growth. This quadrant is centered around three areas: 1) employee capabilities, 2) information system capabilities, and 3) motivation, empowerment, and alignment. As mentioned throughout this book, these areas have been overlooked in the past because they have not shown tangible contributions to the bottom line. Lack of attention to learning and growth is similar to avoiding regular maintenance and repair on your home. Initially, the effects will not be readily apparent, but may over time build to dramatic proportions. Just like a small water leak can destroy a wall, lack of alignment (goal sharing) and motivation will have devastating effects on a company's ability to be productive and generate shareholder value. Unfortunately, these areas are the most difficult to measure. Organizational constructs are difficult for traditionally trained managers to understand. Managers have a high degree of comfort with "hard" metrics such as time, costs, and revenues. These can be tied directly into the financial performance of the company. It is difficult to link employee satisfaction with cost control or sales. These relationships are anecdotal at best; for example, "Disgruntled employees will not treat your customers well because they are unhappy".

Some of the same conceptual fuzziness with learning and growth is prevalent in evaluating technology. Assessing the performance of the technological infrastructure can be straight forward (e.g., system downtime). The challenge arises when trying to understand how well technology meets the requirements of the business. Exhibit 5-9 shows metrics for the learning and growth quadrant.

[1]Charles P. Jones, Investments, Analyses, and Interpretation, 7th Edition (New York: Wiley & Sons, 2000), pp. 369–371.

[2]Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996), p. 126.



425 times read

Related news

» The Financial Quadrant
by admin posted on Aug 15,2010
» The Learning and Growth Quadrant
by admin posted on Aug 15,2010
» The Balanced Scorecard
by admin posted on Aug 15,2010
» Using the Balanced Scorecard to Drive Value
by admin posted on Aug 15,2010
» The Internal Business Process Quadrant
by admin posted on Aug 15,2010
Did you enjoy this article?
(total 0 votes)

comment Comments (0 posted) 
Please Comment On This Article