Internal Strategic Alternatives
Overview
STRATEGIC
ALTERNATIVES are normally viewed as initiatives that are external in nature.
Mergers and acquisitions and outsourcing are well publicized and make headlines
in major business and industry periodicals. There has been a growing preference
toward external Strategic Alternatives that is validated by the growth in the
value of mergers as well as the size of outsourcing contracts. Yes, these
external means are important and are viable ways to execute against a strategic
plan. Yet these alternatives need to be looked at carefully as their effectiveness is not conclusive. On the
other hand, internal SAs have taken a backseat in terms of visibility and
priority. Internal initiatives, or efforts where internal means are used to
develop specific competencies, are equally as important as external SAs, and
they are viable ways of increasing value. On balance, internally developed
competencies may generate more value in the long run, have lower cultural
hurdles to overcome, and have lower switching costs and barriers to exit. It is
much harder to unwind a merger or rebuild an outsourced service than to scrap an
internal initiative.
This chapter will deal with two of the most common internal
SAs—information technology and business process reengineering. (For the purposes
of our discussion, the terms IT and technology will be used interchangeably.)
Despite the bursting of the Internet bubble in the late 1990s, the strategic use
of information technology will continue to grow. We will see a more thoughtful
use of technology in the future predicated on economic justification, not
marketing hype. This trend has already started with the performance of crude
financial tests such as ROI (return on investment) measures. As the size and
complexity of IT systems continues to increase, businesses realize that this is
something they need to get right—especially since many systems are now shared
directly with their customers.
A closely related initiative to IT is business process reengineering (BPR). BPR is a simply a drastic
change in what you do as a business. The relationship between these two SAs is
that technology projects invariably spawn a reengineering project.
Implementations in large-scale technology projects will naturally change the way
you conduct business. Of course, BPR can also be implemented as a stand-alone
and independent way to increase value. Many large companies have units whose
sole function is reengineering of processes. Since drastic change is involved,
BPR becomes a high stakes game where the end result can change as fast as the
process.