Commodity or
value add?
The inverse relationship between employee satisfaction,
customer satisfaction and profitability shown in both studies is directly
opposite to that cited in much literature today: 'employee loyalty and customer
loyalty reinforce each other, making jobs more satisfying and further increasing
the potential for superior customer value'. [8] 'In a nutshell, if employees are more satisfied then
so are customers.' [9]
However, 'fifty percent of people in business refuse to accept the strong
evidence that good people management practices lead to higher profits in the
long term'. [10]
The respondents from this study certainly individually embraced
the values of CRM by making sure that they focused on customer needs, regardless
of whether these were primarily internal or external customers. It was often the
customer interaction, and the satisfaction of doing a job that customers
appreciated, that kept job satisfaction and morale as high as it was shown to
be. However, in contrast, the same respondents were often cynical about the
company's attitude to CRM and also were unhappy about the way they were
treated.
One thing that became clear was that generally morale is lower
than it used to be because of lack of resource, budget and managerial concerns.
Further research is needed to discover why
this is, but certainly working practices have changed radically in many
industries over the last two decades. Strong-knit communities have been replaced
by virtual teams, remote working and communication via e-mail, Web and telephone
rather than mainly face-to-face. Efficiency has been improved enormously, to the
point that many people have become superfluous and have been let go by companies
during lean times but not replaced when economies have strengthened again.
Remaining employees (including the managerial levels) pick up the
extra work, drop the least important and work longer hours. This reduces
effectiveness, and more technology is brought in to try to fix this (for example
call centres, sales force automation, Web sites and mobile working). Many
customers adapt to the new way (some even force this way of doing business via
their supply chain systems) but not all. Amazingly in all of this, companies
remain in profit in the majority of cases. (There were of course pockets of
higher satisfaction, as noted in the main body of the paper, but they were in
the minority.)
Another research question to come out of this study is, 'Are
employees becoming commoditized?' Reichheld discussed the economic models of why
long-term employees create value to a company and how layoffs have a destructive
effect on employee loyalty. [11] According to this survey, the effect of investing
in employees (via education and good packages) to encourage retention and
loyalty was not the positive one that Reichheld argues; because the employees
were not using their training, it negated feelings of being valued by the
company, thus reducing morale. Combine this with the fear of redundancy and high
workloads, and employees feel as if they are a commodity rather than a
high-value part of the business.