Super Business - Project Management Articles


Sections
Syndication



Commodity or value add?


Commodity or value add?

The inverse relationship between employee satisfaction, customer satisfaction and profitability shown in both studies is directly opposite to that cited in much literature today: 'employee loyalty and customer loyalty reinforce each other, making jobs more satisfying and further increasing the potential for superior customer value'. [8] 'In a nutshell, if employees are more satisfied then so are customers.' [9] However, 'fifty percent of people in business refuse to accept the strong evidence that good people management practices lead to higher profits in the long term'. [10]

The respondents from this study certainly individually embraced the values of CRM by making sure that they focused on customer needs, regardless of whether these were primarily internal or external customers. It was often the customer interaction, and the satisfaction of doing a job that customers appreciated, that kept job satisfaction and morale as high as it was shown to be. However, in contrast, the same respondents were often cynical about the company's attitude to CRM and also were unhappy about the way they were treated.

One thing that became clear was that generally morale is lower than it used to be because of lack of resource, budget and managerial concerns. Further research is needed to discover why this is, but certainly working practices have changed radically in many industries over the last two decades. Strong-knit communities have been replaced by virtual teams, remote working and communication via e-mail, Web and telephone rather than mainly face-to-face. Efficiency has been improved enormously, to the point that many people have become superfluous and have been let go by companies during lean times but not replaced when economies have strengthened again.

Remaining employees (including the managerial levels) pick up the extra work, drop the least important and work longer hours. This reduces effectiveness, and more technology is brought in to try to fix this (for example call centres, sales force automation, Web sites and mobile working). Many customers adapt to the new way (some even force this way of doing business via their supply chain systems) but not all. Amazingly in all of this, companies remain in profit in the majority of cases. (There were of course pockets of higher satisfaction, as noted in the main body of the paper, but they were in the minority.)

Another research question to come out of this study is, 'Are employees becoming commoditized?' Reichheld discussed the economic models of why long-term employees create value to a company and how layoffs have a destructive effect on employee loyalty. [11] According to this survey, the effect of investing in employees (via education and good packages) to encourage retention and loyalty was not the positive one that Reichheld argues; because the employees were not using their training, it negated feelings of being valued by the company, thus reducing morale. Combine this with the fear of redundancy and high workloads, and employees feel as if they are a commodity rather than a high-value part of the business.


92 times read

Related news

» Characteristics of the Highest-Performing Companies
by admin posted on Jul 20,2008
» Demand-side promiscuity (and control by customers)
by admin posted on Jul 20,2008
» Customer Capital
by admin posted on Jan 10,2008
» Industrial products: link between satisfaction and purchase behaviour
by admin posted on Jul 20,2008
» Characteristics most closely associated with high scores Analysis and Planning
by admin posted on Jul 20,2008