Measurement and CRM Metrics in B2B
Until now measurement of CRM performance in B2B has been largely
determined from a supplier perspective, predominantly revenue oriented: that is,
reflecting not what is valued by the customer but rather what is important to
the supplier. Despite this, customer satisfaction was measured in B2B companies
long before CRM became the buzzword in B2B. Particularly in key account
management, the value of customer relationships and loyalty have been long
recognized, although it had been very ad hoc until recent years. In most cases,
B2B CRM was personalized: account managers had to manage relationships
effectively in order to achieve their targets. Today we are seeing that
awareness and responsibility at an enterprise level.
The main metrics for key account managers until now have been:
We are seeing a move towards more appropriate relationship
oriented measurement, measuring for example how many senior executives have been
contacted in a given time period. Inevitably, revenue metrics (which are
supplier oriented) will remain, although they will become more relevant to the
customer as risk-reward and profit sharing arrangements become more pervasive.
That is to say, the metrics will reflect supplier and customer shareholder
value.
The 360-degree feedback approach, in which customers give
feedback to their suppliers about the quality of the latter's staff, has been
adopted in many global organizations, and appears to be a step in the right
direction in terms of understanding the CRM performance of key individuals. The
problem here is measurement: few supplier organizations are willing to reward
their representatives for anything other than revenue. What is needed is a key
set of human relationship metrics for CRM in B2B. In the meantime, a common
approach is to ask customers at the beginning of a time period what they value
and then measure CRM performance against this. Indeed this is IBM's approach on
a project-by-project basis with the pre-consulting engagement 'conditions of
satisfaction' assessment, in which IBM asks its customers what five things it
needs to do to achieve customer satisfaction on the project.