Header
Home | Set as homepage | Add to favorites
  Search the Site     » Advanced Search
Sections
Syndication



Lower-quartile performers

by

image

 

Lower-quartile performers

Lower-quartile companies (for example, low CMAT scorers) are likely to operate a classic product organizational model with strong product management disciplines and a focus on product sales. There will be a limited focus on the overall proposition, and their approach to marketing will not be focused on customers. Companies towards the top of this quartile believe that better coordination in CM will improve customer satisfaction and loyalty. However, customer management in these organizations is likely to be 'champion-based' (enthusiastic individuals), and senior, cross-enterprise leadership not apparent.

Table 16.2 suggests that these companies need to invest heavily in infrastructure and programmes. Careful project planning is needed to allow the achievement of quick wins that help justify continuing investment, but net benefits will be more apparent towards the latter stages of, say, a three-year programme. With the short-termism commented on earlier, does this imply that poorly performing companies are unlikely to invest in customer management because the payback is in two or three years? If they do not invest, our correlation work (see Figure 16.1) shows that they will continue to under-perform from a business perspective. At best they become targets for hostile merger or takeover activity. At worst they could go out of business.

Table 16.2: Indicative estimate returns

Customer management performance

Likely investment level needed

Likely main investment areas

Likely ROI year 1

Likely ROI year 2

Likely ROI year 3

Overall ROI (simple average over 3 years)

Lower quartile performer

High

Whole model

1

3

7

3.67

Third quartile

Medium-high

Whole model

2

3

7

4

Second quartile

Low-medium

Measurement, activity, proposition, IT

3

4

5

4

Highest quartile performer (est)

Tactical

People, activity, customer experience

4.5

5

5.5

5

The investment in these companies should not be biased towards IT systems, as it often is in practice, but should be applied across the enterprise for all aspects of CM. Our CMAT work shows that companies at this stage benefit from making the customer management process more robust, but the net benefits should be reinvested in developing infrastructure. Steady investment for these companies is not an option. However, relative performance might not increase if competitors are also investing from a more advanced starting point. The decision facing senior managers and stakeholders in these businesses is to look long and hard at their market potential, and either invest significantly to achieve a step-change in customer management, or divest, sell or merge. Commitment, strong leadership, higher investment and careful project planning are required to generate attractive benefits over time.


132 times read

Related news

» Business benefits: two worked examples
by admin posted on Jul 20,2008
» Maturity and the time dimension
by admin posted on Jul 20,2008
» Higher-quartile performers
by admin posted on Jul 20,2008
» The Business Case for Customer Management
by admin posted on Jul 20,2008
» Net benefit by customer maturity
by admin posted on Jul 20,2008


More Top News
International Project Management
Most Popular
Most Commented
Featured Author