|
Developing the proposition |
|
9% DO involve all proposition stakeholders in its
development |
Fewer than 1 in 10 companies involve all the providers of
the proposition (eg sales channels, service, technical support, product
development, administration) in defining their proposition. No wonder so many
propositions are undelivered - they are probably undeliverable because functions
involved in delivery have never been consulted! |
|
54% DO NOT have a clearly defined proposition |
Less than half of companies researched actually define any
proposition with standards that can be used to measure
that the proposition is being delivered. The challenge is to translate the
proposition into something that is REALLY understood by everyone (to help guide
values, beliefs and behaviour) and then to ensure that these become embedded in
the norms of the organization. |
|
24% DO carry out needs research on customers and
prospects |
Only a quarter of organizations carry out true NEEDS
research among either customers or prospects. Many more carry out other types of
research but this does not reveal customers' underlying needs. It often focuses
on views about the current or future product range. |
|
9% DO carry out needs research by segment |
Many propositions are developed which are simply irrelevant
to high-value customers. Only about 1 in 10 carry out needs-based research by
segment. |
|
War story: irrelevant proposition
Rail companies often report their performance in stations
using posters. A regional UK railway did this, but the elements that they chose
to focus on, illustrated with large wall posters in the station, included
factors such as 'temperature of carriage' and 'comfort of seats'. They did cover
punctuality but ignored the other factors that were most important to customers,
such as reliability, availability of seats, keeping customers informed, and
cleanliness of trains. It will come as no surprise that they scored highly on
most of the things they reported on! |
|
These last few points suggest that many companies do not
recognize the determinants of customer repeat purchase (ie not just 'the brand'
or television or marketing messages, or the loyalty scheme, but each and every
experience with the brand). Some companies are simply confused about this whole
area. Apart from consumer goods companies, there is limited recognition of the
role of emotional loyalty as a input to proposition development. |
|
Communicating the proposition
|
|
36% DO NOT formally check that customers and prospects
understand their proposition |
The most successful companies focus on keeping the
proposition in the minds of their customers and staff. Just over a third of
organizations do not check that either their customers or their own staff fully
understand their proposition. This usually means identifying measures that are
easily understood and monitored, but that also reflect the key dimensions of the
proposition. It also means always tying reward and recognition (not necessarily
financial) mechanics to proposition measures. |
|
17% DO NOT check that customer-facing staff understand their
proposition |
It is no wonder that various studies have shown that a high
proportion of complaints are caused by a mismatch between what customers think
they are entitled to and what the organization thinks it is providing. Actual
service or product failures account for far fewer complaints. |
|
War story: separate propositions within same
company
One utility organization that was assessed had four separate
market channels: sales force, call centre, direct mail and a Web site. Each
channel had a source of support information on the proposition, and although
managers tried to keep these synchronized, there were invariably differences, It
was possible for prospects to get different versions of service entitlement and
price from the four different channels, even though this was NOT the company
policy. |