Financial
services company: using profitability analysis
A European financial service provider (bank accounts, loans,
mortgages, insurance, investments) carried out some relatively simple analysis
to look at customer profitability. To do this, the company calculated the
current value (CV) and net present value (NPV) from predictable income (for
example, from committed revenue streams such as loan and mortgage payments
planned) and NPV of less predictable income from cross-selling. It attempted to
build in a contribution from the 'recommended' business from that customer, but
for this company it proved too unreliable.
It then carried out a decile analysis combining CV and NPV of
current customers, using actual and committed income. This showed that 77 per
cent of the profit came from 20 per cent of the base. It used the results of
some carefully constructed cross-selling tests to develop propensity models.
These models were tested and adjusted to be, at worst, 68 per cent predictive.
Then, based on these CV and NPV deciles, it plotted where the future value lay.
The analysis chart showed that although the top decile had probably achieved its
peak (older customers in this case), deciles 2 and 3 had a great deal of
potential, with deciles 7 and 8 also containing some potential high-value
segments (younger customers, still early on their value curve for this company).
This was useful in that it helped it value the customer base, determine
retention, development and 'exit encouragement' programmes to create more value,
and develop segment profiles usable for acquisition, retention and development
planning.
An analysis of retention behaviour of the investment value/needs
segments (see Figure 5.2) showed
that the company had a problem with its proposition to specific value/needs
cells. The attrition of customers in high-value deciles within the 'facilities
management' speculator group (a group that likes to speculate in financial
markets, but wants a company to do all the work) appeared high. Research of
these value/needs groups implied that the company's direct sales force needed
specific competency development, and that laptop PCs, giving up-to-date
portfolio information, should be used face to face with clients.
Application of this knowledge has clearly created value for
the company, as can be measured via the database. Possibly more importantly,
this work led to a step-change in the understanding this company has of how to
manage customers.